Alpaca vs Interactive Brokers API

These are the two most common broker APIs for retail algo traders, and they sit at opposite ends: Alpaca is a cloud API built for developers; IBKR is a global broker with a powerful but infrastructure-heavy API.

Last verified

Quick answer

Choose Alpaca for US stocks, ETFs and crypto when you want plain REST with API keys and free paper trading. Choose Interactive Brokers when you need global stocks, futures, FX or bonds and can run TWS or IB Gateway with paced historical requests and paid data subscriptions.

Side-by-side comparison

APIMarketsAuthPaper / sandboxPricingIn AlgoGP
AlpacaStocks, ETFs, CryptoREST + API keyPaper trading account with simulated fillsFree account; free IEX market data planBuilt into AlgoGP
Interactive BrokersStocks, ETFs, Options, Futures, Forex, Bonds, CryptoLocal gatewayPaper trading account (TWS port 7497, Gateway 4002)API free with account; market data subscriptions extraGuide

Which one should you pick?

Key differences

AlpacaInteractive Brokers
ConnectionHTTPS REST + WebSocketSocket to TWS / IB Gateway
AuthTwo API key headersLogged-in gateway session
PaperSeparate paper keys and hostPaper login, port 7497 / 4002
MarketsUS stocks, ETFs, options, crypto150+ markets, futures, FX, bonds
DataFree IEX; $99/mo all exchangesPer-exchange subscriptions
Pythonalpaca-pyib_async, ibapi

Frequently asked questions

Can I start on Alpaca and move to IBKR later?

Yes. Keep the strategy separate from the broker adapter (AlgoGP exports do this) and swap the adapter.

Test the strategy before you pick the API

Describe your idea to AlgoGP’s copilot, backtest it on years of stock, crypto or forex data with realistic costs, then export Python wired to Alpaca or any built-in broker. Swap the broker later without touching the strategy.

More API comparisons

AlgoGP is not affiliated with any provider listed. Details change; check each provider’s documentation. Nothing here is investment advice.